Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct vs Qwen3.5 9B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Qwen3.5 9B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 9B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 9B
Speed
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructQwen3.5 9B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructQwen3.5 9B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaQwen
ReleasedSep 2024Mar 2026

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3.5 9B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.06/M tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.06/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 9B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 21.3, compared to Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct's score of 4.2.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3.5 9B has a 262,144 token context window.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct supports vision. Qwen3.5 9B does not support vision.