Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder Next

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls

Qwen3 Coder Next wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder Next
Speed
Qwen3 Coder Next

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 Coder NextWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.07 Qwen3 Coder Next
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.32$0.30 Qwen3 Coder Next
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$35000.00 Qwen3 Coder Next
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 Coder Next is 18% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Providers

DeepInfra $0.10 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.14
Parasail $0.22
Nebius $0.25
Crusoe $0.25

Qwen3 Coder Next Providers

Chutes $0.07 (Cheapest)
Parasail $0.15
Novita $0.20
Together $0.50

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Wins
3
Qwen3 Coder Next Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 Coder NextWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
14.228.1
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
10.722.9
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
7.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
71.3--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
49.873.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
28.8--
Aider
Real-world code editing
59.4--
AIME
Competition math
30.0--
Qwen3 Coder Next significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 Coder NextWinner
Tokens/second104.4 tok/s124.3 tok/s
Time to First Token0.49s0.81s
Qwen3 Coder Next responds 19% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 Coder Next
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3 Coder Next
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaQwen
ReleasedDec 2024Feb 2026

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder Next Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.3 70B Instruct with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder Next with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 22.9, compared to Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's score of 10.7.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder Next has a 262,144 token context window.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct does not support vision. Qwen3 Coder Next does not support vision.