Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Qwen3.5 0.8B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls

Qwen3.5 0.8B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5 0.8B
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Speed
Qwen3.5 0.8B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3.5 0.8B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3.5 0.8B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaQwen
ReleasedDec 2024Unknown

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5 0.8B Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5 0.8B has cheaper input pricing at $0.01/M tokens. Qwen3.5 0.8B has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.7, compared to Qwen3.5 0.8B's score of 1.0.