Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Reka

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Reka Flash 3

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports tool calls

Reka Flash 3 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Reka Flash 3
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.3 70B InstructReka Flash 3
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.3 70B InstructReka Flash 3
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaReka
ReleasedDec 2024Mar 2025

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Reka Flash 3 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Reka Flash 3 has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.7, compared to Reka Flash 3's score of 8.9.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while Reka Flash 3 has a 65,536 token context window.