Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.5-27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 4 Maverick wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Llama 4 Maverick
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Context Window
Llama 4 Maverick
Speed
Llama 4 Maverick

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 MaverickQwen3.5-27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 4 MaverickQwen3.5-27B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaQwen
ReleasedApr 2025Feb 2026

Llama 4 Maverick Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 4 Maverick has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. Llama 4 Maverick has cheaper output pricing at $0.60/M tokens.
Qwen3.5-27B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 33.4, compared to Llama 4 Maverick's score of 15.6.
Llama 4 Maverick has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window.
Llama 4 Maverick supports vision. Qwen3.5-27B supports vision.