Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 4 Scout wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 4 Scout
Context Window
Llama 4 Scout
Speed
Llama 4 Scout

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.08$0.04 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.10 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 59% cheaper overall.

Llama 4 Scout Providers

DeepInfra $0.08 (Cheapest)
Friendli $0.10
Vercel $0.10
Groq $0.11
Novita $0.18

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Providers

Phala $0.04 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.04 (Cheapest)
Together $0.30

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
2
Llama 4 Scout Wins
1
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
13.535.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
6.7--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
14.0--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
75.236.5
GPQA
Graduate-level science
58.75.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
29.9--
AIME
Competition math
28.3--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-34.9-
Llama 4 Scout significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 4 Scout
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 4 Scout
327,680
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
32,768
tokens
Llama 4 Scout has a 90% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Tokens/second156.0 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.49sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 4 ScoutQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaQwen
ReleasedApr 2025Oct 2024

Llama 4 Scout Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 4 Scout with:

Compare Qwen2.5 7B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Llama 4 Scout scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 6.7, compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
Llama 4 Scout has a 327,680 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
Llama 4 Scout supports vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.