Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Phind CodeLlama 34B v1 vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Phind CodeLlama 34B v1 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Phind CodeLlama 34B v1
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeaturePhind CodeLlama 34B v1MiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyPhind CodeLlama 34B v1MiniMax M2.7
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaMinimax
ReleasedUnknownMar 2026

Phind CodeLlama 34B v1 Modalities

Input
Output

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Phind CodeLlama 34B v1 has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Phind CodeLlama 34B v1 has a 16,384 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.