Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Microsoft
Microsoft
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 482 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Context Window
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Speed
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricPhi-3 Mini 128K InstructQwen3 VL 8B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.08 Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.20 Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.10 Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct is 9% cheaper overall.

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
1
Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct Wins
2
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkPhi-3 Mini 128K InstructQwen3 VL 8B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
26.314.3
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-7.3-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-27.3-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
30.468.6
GPQA
Graduate-level science
9.142.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-33.2-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
37.1--
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct
128,000
tokens
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct has a 2% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricPhi-3 Mini 128K InstructQwen3 VL 8B InstructWinner
Tokens/secondN/A138.4 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A1.05s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeaturePhi-3 Mini 128K InstructQwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyPhi-3 Mini 128K InstructQwen3 VL 8B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMicrosoftQwen
ReleasedUnknownOct 2025

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct with:

Compare Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.08/M tokens. Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 7.3, compared to Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct's score of N/A.
Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct has a 128,000 token context window, while Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct does not support vision. Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct supports vision.
Advertise with us