Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Microsoft
Microsoft
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Phi 4 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Phi 4 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Phi 4
Context Window
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Speed
Phi 4

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricPhi 4Qwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.06$0.04 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.14$0.10 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 31% cheaper overall.

Phi 4 Providers

NextBit $0.06 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.07

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Providers

Phala $0.04 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.04 (Cheapest)
Together $0.30

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
2
Phi 4 Wins
1
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkPhi 4Qwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
10.535.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
11.2--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
18.0--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
71.436.5
GPQA
Graduate-level science
57.55.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
23.1--
AIME
Competition math
14.3--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-34.9-
Phi 4 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Phi 4
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Phi 4
16,384
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
32,768
tokens
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricPhi 4Qwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Tokens/second6.0 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.79sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeaturePhi 4Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyPhi 4Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMicrosoftQwen
ReleasedJan 2025Oct 2024

Phi 4 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Phi 4 with:

Compare Qwen2.5 7B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Phi 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 11.2, compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
Phi 4 has a 16,384 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
Phi 4 does not support vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.