Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Microsoft
Microsoft
vs
Qwen
Qwen

WizardLM-2 8x22B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

WizardLM-2 8x22B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
WizardLM-2 8x22B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Speed
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureWizardLM-2 8x22BQwen3.5-122B-A10B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyWizardLM-2 8x22BQwen3.5-122B-A10B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMicrosoftQwen
ReleasedApr 2024Feb 2026

WizardLM-2 8x22B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has cheaper input pricing at $0.26/M tokens. WizardLM-2 8x22B has cheaper output pricing at $0.62/M tokens.
WizardLM-2 8x22B has a 65,535 token context window, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has a 262,144 token context window.
WizardLM-2 8x22B does not support vision. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B supports vision.