Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Qwen
Qwen

MiniMax M2.1 vs Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Context Window
MiniMax M2.1
Speed
MiniMax M2.1

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMiniMax M2.1Qwen2.5-VL 7B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.27$0.20 Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.95$0.20 Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)$30000.00N/A MiniMax M2.1
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct is 55% cheaper overall.

MiniMax M2.1 Providers

Chutes $0.27 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.27 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.29
SiliconFlow $0.29
Minimax $0.30

Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct Providers

Hyperbolic $0.20 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
3
MiniMax M2.1 Wins
0
Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen2.5-VL 7B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
39.526.5
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
32.8--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
82.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
87.534.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
83.09.3
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
81.0--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-35.9-
MiniMax M2.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
MiniMax M2.1
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

MiniMax M2.1
196,608
tokens
Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct
32,768
tokens
MiniMax M2.1 has a 83% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricMiniMax M2.1Qwen2.5-VL 7B InstructWinner
Tokens/second60.6 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token1.73sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.1Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.1Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Aug 2024

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.1 with:

Compare Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 32.8, compared to Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window, while Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision. Qwen2.5-VL 7B Instruct supports vision.