Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Qwen
Qwen

MiniMax M2.1 vs Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 480 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Context Window
MiniMax M2.1
Speed
MiniMax M2.1

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMiniMax M2.1Qwen2.5 0.5B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.27$0.20 Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.95$0.20 Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.03$0.10 MiniMax M2.1
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct is 55% cheaper overall.

MiniMax M2.1 Providers

No provider data available

Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
MiniMax M2.1 Wins
0
Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen2.5 0.5B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
39.4--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
32.8--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
82.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
87.5--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
83.0--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
81.0--
MiniMax M2.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
MiniMax M2.1
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

MiniMax M2.1
196,608
tokens
Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct
N/A
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricMiniMax M2.1Qwen2.5 0.5B InstructWinner
Tokens/second41.7 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token2.07sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.1Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.1Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorMinimaxQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Unknown

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.1 with:

Compare Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 32.8, compared to Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window, while Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct has a unknown token context window.
MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision. Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct does not support vision.
Advertise with us