Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

MiniMax M2.5 vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Voxtral Small 24B 2507
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.5Voxtral Small 24B 2507
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.5Voxtral Small 24B 2507
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxMistral AI
ReleasedFeb 2026Oct 2025

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 Modalities

Input
textaudio
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 has a 196,608 token context window, while Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has a 32,000 token context window.
MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 does not support vision.