Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Qwen
Qwen

MiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen-Plus

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Qwen-Plus wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
Qwen-Plus
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMiniMax M2.5Qwen-PlusWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.40 MiniMax M2.5
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.20$1.20Tie
Cache Read (per 1M)$30000.00$80000.00 MiniMax M2.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, MiniMax M2.5 is 13% cheaper overall.

MiniMax M2.5 Providers

Minimax $0.30 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.30 (Cheapest)

Qwen-Plus Providers

Alibaba $0.40 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

3
Benchmarks Compared
0
MiniMax M2.5 Wins
0
Qwen-Plus Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen-PlusWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
42.0--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
37.4--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
84.8--
MiniMax M2.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

MiniMax M2.5
204,800
tokens
Max output: 131,072 tokens
Qwen-Plus
1,000,000
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
Qwen-Plus has a 80% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricMiniMax M2.5Qwen-PlusWinner
Tokens/second71.0 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token1.67sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.5Qwen-Plus
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.5Qwen-Plus
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxQwen
ReleasedFeb 2026Feb 2025

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen-Plus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Compare Qwen-Plus with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Qwen-Plus's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.5 has a 204,800 token context window, while Qwen-Plus has a 1,000,000 token context window.
MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision. Qwen-Plus does not support vision.