Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Qwen
Qwen

MiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 480 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMiniMax M2.5Qwen2.5 14B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.27$0.20 Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.95$0.20 Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.03$0.10 MiniMax M2.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is 55% cheaper overall.

MiniMax M2.5 Providers

No provider data available

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

3
Benchmarks Compared
0
MiniMax M2.5 Wins
0
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen2.5 14B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
41.9--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
37.4--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
84.8--
MiniMax M2.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

MiniMax M2.5
196,608
tokens
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
N/A
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricMiniMax M2.5Qwen2.5 14B InstructWinner
Tokens/second38.9 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token2.11sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.5Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.5Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorMinimaxQwen
ReleasedFeb 2026Unknown

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Compare Qwen2.5 14B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Qwen2.5 14B Instruct's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.5 has a 196,608 token context window, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has a unknown token context window.
MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not support vision.
Advertise with us