Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Qwen
Qwen

MiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen3 235B A22B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Qwen3 235B A22B wins:

  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 235B A22BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.30Tie
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.20$1.20Tie
Cache Read (per 1M)$30000.00$150000.00 MiniMax M2.5
Both models have similar overall pricing.

MiniMax M2.5 Providers

Minimax $0.30 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.30 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 235B A22B Providers

Chutes $0.30 (Cheapest)
Alibaba $0.46

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
3
MiniMax M2.5 Wins
0
Qwen3 235B A22B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 235B A22BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
42.016.9
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
37.414.0
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-23.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-76.2-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
84.861.3
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-34.3-
Aider
Real-world code editing
-59.6-
AIME
Competition math
-32.7-
MiniMax M2.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

MiniMax M2.5
204,800
tokens
Max output: 131,072 tokens
Qwen3 235B A22B
40,960
tokens
Max output: 40,960 tokens
MiniMax M2.5 has a 80% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 235B A22BWinner
Tokens/second71.0 tok/s44.1 tok/s
Time to First Token1.67s1.17s
MiniMax M2.5 responds 61% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 235B A22B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 235B A22B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxQwen
ReleasedFeb 2026Apr 2025

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 235B A22B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Compare Qwen3 235B A22B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Qwen3 235B A22B's score of 14.0.
MiniMax M2.5 has a 204,800 token context window, while Qwen3 235B A22B has a 40,960 token context window.
MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision. Qwen3 235B A22B does not support vision.