Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Qwen
Qwen

MiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen3 4B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 480 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Qwen3 4B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Qwen3 4B
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
Qwen3 4B

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 4BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.27$0.20 Qwen3 4B
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.95$0.20 Qwen3 4B
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.03$0.10 MiniMax M2.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 4B is 55% cheaper overall.

MiniMax M2.5 Providers

No provider data available

Qwen3 4B Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
2
MiniMax M2.5 Wins
0
Qwen3 4B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 4BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
41.912.5
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
37.4--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-58.6-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
84.839.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-23.3-
AIME
Competition math
-21.3-
MiniMax M2.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

MiniMax M2.5
196,608
tokens
Qwen3 4B
N/A
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 4BWinner
Tokens/second38.9 tok/s104.8 tok/s
Time to First Token2.11s0.95s
Qwen3 4B responds 169% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 4B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 4B
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorMinimaxQwen
ReleasedFeb 2026Unknown

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 4B Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Compare Qwen3 4B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 4B has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Qwen3 4B has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Qwen3 4B's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.5 has a 196,608 token context window, while Qwen3 4B has a unknown token context window.
MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision. Qwen3 4B does not support vision.
Advertise with us