Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Qwen
Qwen

MiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.22 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.20$1.00 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Cache Read (per 1M)$30000.00$22000.00 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) is 21% cheaper overall.

MiniMax M2.5 Providers

Minimax $0.30 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.30 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Providers

Google $0.22 (Cheapest)
SiliconFlow $0.25
Novita $0.30
Vercel $0.40
Nebius $0.40

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
3
MiniMax M2.5 Wins
0
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
42.024.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
37.424.6
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-39.3-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-78.8-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
84.861.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-58.5-
AIME
Competition math
-47.7-
MiniMax M2.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

MiniMax M2.5
204,800
tokens
Max output: 131,072 tokens
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
262,144
tokens
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 22% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Tokens/second71.0 tok/s54.4 tok/s
Time to First Token1.67s1.67s-
MiniMax M2.5 responds 30% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxQwen
ReleasedFeb 2026Jul 2025

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.22/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $1.00/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)'s score of 24.6.
MiniMax M2.5 has a 204,800 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) does not support vision.