Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Qwen
Qwen

MiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen3 Coder Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Qwen3 Coder Flash wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 Coder Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 Coder Flash
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMinimaxQwen
ReleasedFeb 2026Sep 2025

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.97/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 has a 196,608 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder Flash has a 1,000,000 token context window.
MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision. Qwen3 Coder Flash does not support vision.