Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Xiaomi

MiniMax M2.5 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.5MiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.5MiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxXiaomi
ReleasedFeb 2026Dec 2025

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.09/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to MiMo-V2-Flash's score of 25.8.
MiniMax M2.5 has a 196,608 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.