Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

MiniMax M2.7 vs Devstral 2 2512

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Devstral 2 2512 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
Devstral 2 2512
Speed
Devstral 2 2512

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7Devstral 2 2512
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7Devstral 2 2512
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxMistral AI
ReleasedMar 2026Dec 2025

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Devstral 2 2512 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Devstral 2 2512 has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Devstral 2 2512's score of 23.7.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while Devstral 2 2512 has a 262,144 token context window.