Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

MiniMax M2.7 vs Kimi K2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Kimi K2.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
Kimi K2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7Kimi K2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7Kimi K2.5
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxMoonshotai
ReleasedMar 2026Jan 2026

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Kimi K2.5 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Kimi K2.5's score of 25.8.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while Kimi K2.5 has a 262,144 token context window.