Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

MiniMax M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

116 out of our 496 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Speed
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxNvidia
ReleasedMar 2026Dec 2025

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Compare Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's score of 15.8.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has a 262,144 token context window.
MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B does not support vision.