Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Qwen
Qwen

MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3 Coder Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Qwen3 Coder Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7Qwen3 Coder Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7Qwen3 Coder Flash
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorMinimaxQwen
ReleasedMar 2026Sep 2025

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.97/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder Flash has a 1,000,000 token context window.