Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
?

MiniMax M2.7 vs GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimax
ReleasedMar 2026Unknown

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking has cheaper output pricing at $0.11/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking has a 32,768 token context window.