Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Tngtech

MiniMax M2.7 vs DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxTngtech
ReleasedMar 2026Jul 2025

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Compare DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera has cheaper output pricing at $1.10/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera has a 163,840 token context window.
MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision. DeepSeek R1T2 Chimera does not support vision.