Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Z-ai

MiniMax M2.7 vs GLM-5 FP4

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports tool calls

GLM-5 FP4 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
GLM-5 FP4
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7GLM-5 FP4
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7GLM-5 FP4
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorMinimaxZ-ai
ReleasedMar 2026Unknown

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM-5 FP4 Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Compare GLM-5 FP4 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM-5 FP4 has cheaper input pricing at $0.00/M tokens. GLM-5 FP4 has cheaper output pricing at $0.00/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to GLM-5 FP4's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while GLM-5 FP4 has a unknown token context window.
MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision. GLM-5 FP4 does not support vision.