Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Codestral 2508 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Codestral 2508 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Codestral 2508
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodestral 2508Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCodestral 2508Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Feb 2026

Codestral 2508 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Codestral 2508 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Codestral 2508 has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Codestral 2508 has a 256,000 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
Codestral 2508 does not support vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.