Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Devstral Small 2505 vs Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Devstral Small 2505 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports tool calls

Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Devstral Small 2505
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)
Context Window
Devstral Small 2505
Speed
Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDevstral Small 2505Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDevstral Small 2505Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIQwen

Devstral Small 2505 Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Devstral Small 2505 has cheaper input pricing at $0.00/M tokens. Devstral Small 2505 has cheaper output pricing at $0.00/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 13.7, compared to Devstral Small 2505's score of 12.2.