Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Devstral Small 1.1 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Devstral Small 1.1 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Devstral Small 1.1
Context Window
Devstral Small 1.1
Speed
Devstral Small 1.1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDevstral Small 1.1Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDevstral Small 1.1Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIQwen
ReleasedJul 2025Oct 2024

Devstral Small 1.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Devstral Small 1.1 with:

Compare Qwen2.5 7B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Devstral Small 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 12.1, compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
Devstral Small 1.1 has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
Devstral Small 1.1 does not support vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.