Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Devstral Small 1.1 vs Qwen3 Coder Next

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Devstral Small 1.1 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls

Qwen3 Coder Next wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder Next
Speed
Devstral Small 1.1

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricDevstral Small 1.1Qwen3 Coder NextWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.07 Qwen3 Coder Next
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.30Tie
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$35000.00 Qwen3 Coder Next
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 Coder Next is 15% cheaper overall.

Devstral Small 1.1 Providers

Vercel $0.07 (Cheapest)
Mistral $0.10

Qwen3 Coder Next Providers

Chutes $0.07 (Cheapest)
Parasail $0.15
Novita $0.20
Together $0.50

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
Devstral Small 1.1 Wins
3
Qwen3 Coder Next Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkDevstral Small 1.1Qwen3 Coder NextWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
15.228.1
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
12.122.9
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
29.3--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
62.2--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
41.473.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
25.4--
AIME
Competition math
0.3--
Qwen3 Coder Next significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Devstral Small 1.1
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Devstral Small 1.1
131,072
tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricDevstral Small 1.1Qwen3 Coder NextWinner
Tokens/second236.1 tok/s124.3 tok/s
Time to First Token0.35s0.81s
Devstral Small 1.1 responds 90% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDevstral Small 1.1Qwen3 Coder Next
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDevstral Small 1.1Qwen3 Coder Next
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMistral AIQwen
ReleasedJul 2025Feb 2026

Devstral Small 1.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder Next Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Devstral Small 1.1 with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder Next with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Devstral Small 1.1 has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 22.9, compared to Devstral Small 1.1's score of 12.1.
Devstral Small 1.1 has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder Next has a 262,144 token context window.
Devstral Small 1.1 does not support vision. Qwen3 Coder Next does not support vision.