Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Devstral Small 1.1 vs Qwen3 Coder Next

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Devstral Small 1.1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

Qwen3 Coder Next wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Devstral Small 1.1
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder Next
Speed
Devstral Small 1.1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDevstral Small 1.1Qwen3 Coder Next
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDevstral Small 1.1Qwen3 Coder Next
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIQwen
ReleasedJul 2025Feb 2026

Devstral Small 1.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder Next Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Devstral Small 1.1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Devstral Small 1.1 has cheaper output pricing at $0.28/M tokens.
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 22.9, compared to Devstral Small 1.1's score of 12.1.
Devstral Small 1.1 has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder Next has a 262,144 token context window.
Devstral Small 1.1 does not support vision. Qwen3 Coder Next does not support vision.