Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Magistral Medium vs GPT-5.3 Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Magistral Medium wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Magistral Medium
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
GPT-5.3 Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMagistral MediumGPT-5.3 Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMagistral MediumGPT-5.3 Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMistral AIOpenAI
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

Magistral Medium Modalities

Input
Output

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-5.3 Codex has cheaper input pricing at $1.75/M tokens. Magistral Medium has cheaper output pricing at $5.00/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to Magistral Medium's score of 16.0.
Magistral Medium has a 40,000 token context window, while GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Magistral Medium does not support vision. GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision.