Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Ministral 3 3B 2512 vs Qwen3 Coder Next

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Ministral 3 3B 2512 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports vision

Qwen3 Coder Next wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Ministral 3 3B 2512
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder Next
Speed
Qwen3 Coder Next

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMinistral 3 3B 2512Qwen3 Coder Next
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMinistral 3 3B 2512Qwen3 Coder Next
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Feb 2026

Ministral 3 3B 2512 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder Next Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Ministral 3 3B 2512 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Ministral 3 3B 2512 has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Ministral 3 3B 2512 has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder Next has a 262,144 token context window.
Ministral 3 3B 2512 supports vision. Qwen3 Coder Next does not support vision.