Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Mistral Medium 3.1 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Mistral Medium 3.1
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Speed
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Feb 2026

Mistral Medium 3.1 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has cheaper input pricing at $0.26/M tokens. Mistral Medium 3.1 has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.6, compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's score of 18.3.
Mistral Medium 3.1 has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has a 262,144 token context window.
Mistral Medium 3.1 supports vision. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B supports vision.