Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Mistral Nemo vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Mistral Small 3.2 24B wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Small 3.2 24B
Context Window
Mistral Small 3.2 24B
Speed
Mistral Small 3.2 24B

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMistral NemoMistral Small 3.2 24BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.02$0.06 Mistral Nemo
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.04$0.18 Mistral Nemo
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$30000.00 Mistral Small 3.2 24B
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Mistral Nemo is 72% cheaper overall.

Mistral Nemo Providers

Chutes $0.02 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.02 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.04
Mistral $0.15
Azure $0.30

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Providers

Chutes $0.06 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.07
Parasail $0.09
Mistral $0.10

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
1
Mistral Nemo Wins
2
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMistral NemoMistral Small 3.2 24BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
25.015.0
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-13.3-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-27.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
26.468.1
GPQA
Graduate-level science
8.750.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-27.5-
AIME
Competition math
-32.3-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
36.1--
Mistral Small 3.2 24B significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Mistral Nemo
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Mistral Nemo
131,072
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Mistral Small 3.2 24B
131,072
tokens
Max output: 131,072 tokens

Speed Performance

MetricMistral NemoMistral Small 3.2 24BWinner
Tokens/secondN/A113.4 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A0.29s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral NemoMistral Small 3.2 24B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral NemoMistral Small 3.2 24B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIMistral AI
ReleasedJul 2024Jun 2025

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Nemo with:

Compare Mistral Small 3.2 24B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Mistral Small 3.2 24B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 13.3, compared to Mistral Nemo's score of N/A.
Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window, while Mistral Small 3.2 24B has a 131,072 token context window.
Mistral Nemo does not support vision. Mistral Small 3.2 24B supports vision.