Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Speed
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral NemoQwen3.5-122B-A10B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral NemoQwen3.5-122B-A10B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIQwen
ReleasedJul 2024Feb 2026

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has a 262,144 token context window.
Mistral Nemo does not support vision. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B supports vision.