Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports tool calls

Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Context Window
Mistral Nemo
Speed
Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral NemoQwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral NemoQwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIQwen
ReleasedJul 2024Unknown

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Nemo with:

Compare Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) with:

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 13.7, compared to Mistral Nemo's score of N/A.
Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) has a unknown token context window.
Mistral Nemo does not support vision. Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) does not support vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.