Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3.5-27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-27B
Speed
Qwen3.5-27B

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMistral NemoQwen3.5-27BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.02$0.20 Mistral Nemo
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.04$1.56 Mistral Nemo
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.01$0.27 Mistral Nemo
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Mistral Nemo is 95% cheaper overall.

Mistral Nemo Providers

No provider data available

Qwen3.5-27B Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

5
Benchmarks Compared
0
Mistral Nemo Wins
2
Qwen3.5-27B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMistral NemoQwen3.5-27BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
25.037.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-33.4-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
26.4--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
8.784.2
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
36.1--
Qwen3.5-27B significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Mistral Nemo
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Mistral Nemo
131,072
tokens
Qwen3.5-27B
262,144
tokens
Qwen3.5-27B has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricMistral NemoQwen3.5-27BWinner
Tokens/secondN/A92.1 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A1.32s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral NemoQwen3.5-27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral NemoQwen3.5-27B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIQwen
ReleasedJul 2024Feb 2026

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Nemo with:

Compare Qwen3.5-27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Qwen3.5-27B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 33.4, compared to Mistral Nemo's score of N/A.
Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window.
Mistral Nemo does not support vision. Qwen3.5-27B supports vision.