Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Mistral Small 24B Instruct 2501 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Mistral Small 24B Instruct 2501 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Mistral Small 24B Instruct 2501
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Small 24B Instruct 2501
Context Window
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Speed
Mistral Small 24B Instruct 2501

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Small 24B Instruct 2501Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral Small 24B Instruct 2501Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIQwen
ReleasedJan 2025Oct 2024

Mistral Small 24B Instruct 2501 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Small 24B Instruct 2501 with:

Compare Qwen2.5 7B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Mistral Small 24B Instruct 2501 has cheaper output pricing at $0.08/M tokens.
Mistral Small 24B Instruct 2501 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of N/A, compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
Mistral Small 24B Instruct 2501 has a 32,768 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
Mistral Small 24B Instruct 2501 does not support vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.