Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs GPT-5.3 Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Mistral Small 3.1 24B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Small 3.1 24BGPT-5.3 Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral Small 3.1 24BGPT-5.3 Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMistral AIOpenAI
ReleasedMar 2025Feb 2026

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Small 3.1 24B with:

Compare GPT-5.3 Codex with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Small 3.1 24B has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. Mistral Small 3.1 24B has cheaper output pricing at $0.11/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to Mistral Small 3.1 24B's score of 13.9.
Mistral Small 3.1 24B has a 128,000 token context window, while GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Mistral Small 3.1 24B supports vision. GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision.