Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Mistral Small 3.1 24B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Context Window
Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Speed
Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIQwen
ReleasedMar 2025Unknown

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Small 3.1 24B with:

Compare Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Mistral Small 3.1 24B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 13.9, compared to Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)'s score of 4.9.
Mistral Small 3.1 24B has a 128,000 token context window, while Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) has a unknown token context window.
Mistral Small 3.1 24B supports vision. Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) does not support vision.