Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Xiaomi

Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Mistral Small 3.2 24B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Mistral Small 3.2 24B
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
Mistral Small 3.2 24B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Small 3.2 24BMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral Small 3.2 24BMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIXiaomi
ReleasedJun 2025Dec 2025

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Small 3.2 24B has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Mistral Small 3.2 24B has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Mistral Small 3.2 24B's score of 13.3.
Mistral Small 3.2 24B has a 131,072 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Mistral Small 3.2 24B supports vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.