Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Mistral Tiny vs Qwen3.5-27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Mistral Tiny wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Mistral Tiny
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-27B
Speed
Qwen3.5-27B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral TinyQwen3.5-27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral TinyQwen3.5-27B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIQwen
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

Mistral Tiny Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Tiny has cheaper input pricing at $0.14/M tokens. Mistral Tiny has cheaper output pricing at $0.42/M tokens.
Mistral Tiny has a 32,000 token context window, while Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window.
Mistral Tiny does not support vision. Qwen3.5-27B supports vision.