Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Moonshotai
Moonshotai
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Speed
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureKimi K2 0905 (exacto)Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyKimi K2 0905 (exacto)Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMoonshotaiQwen
ReleasedSep 2025Feb 2026

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has cheaper input pricing at $0.26/M tokens. Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.6, compared to Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)'s score of 25.9.
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has a 262,144 token context window.
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) does not support vision. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B supports vision.