Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Moonshotai
Moonshotai
vs
Z-ai

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) vs GLM 5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

GLM 5 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
GLM 5
Context Window
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Speed
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureKimi K2 0905 (exacto)GLM 5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyKimi K2 0905 (exacto)GLM 5
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMoonshotaiZ-ai
ReleasedSep 2025Feb 2026

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM 5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
GLM 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 39.0, compared to Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)'s score of 25.9.
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window, while GLM 5 has a 202,752 token context window.
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) does not support vision. GLM 5 does not support vision.