Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Moonshotai
Moonshotai
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) vs GPT-5.3 Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
GPT-5.3 Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureKimi K2 0905 (exacto)GPT-5.3 Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyKimi K2 0905 (exacto)GPT-5.3 Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMoonshotaiOpenAI
ReleasedSep 2025Feb 2026

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)'s score of 25.9.
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window, while GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) does not support vision. GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision.