Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Moonshotai
Moonshotai
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Kimi K2 Thinking vs Qwen3 235B A22B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Kimi K2 Thinking wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics

Qwen3 235B A22B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen3 235B A22B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 235B A22B
Context Window
Qwen3 235B A22B
Speed
Qwen3 235B A22B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureKimi K2 ThinkingQwen3 235B A22B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyKimi K2 ThinkingQwen3 235B A22B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMoonshotaiQwen
ReleasedNov 2025Apr 2025

Kimi K2 Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 235B A22B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 235B A22B has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B has cheaper output pricing at $0.80/M tokens.
Kimi K2 Thinking has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3 235B A22B has a 131,072 token context window.
Kimi K2 Thinking does not support vision. Qwen3 235B A22B does not support vision.