Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Moonshotai
Moonshotai
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Kimi K2 Thinking vs Qwen3 Coder Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

101 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Kimi K2 Thinking wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3 Coder Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Benchmark Advantage
Kimi K2 Thinking
Context Window
Kimi K2 Thinking
Speed
Kimi K2 Thinking

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricKimi K2 ThinkingQwen3 Coder FlashWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.30 Qwen3 Coder Flash
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.75$1.50 Qwen3 Coder Flash
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$80000.00 Qwen3 Coder Flash
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 Coder Flash is 19% cheaper overall.

Kimi K2 Thinking Providers

Chutes $0.40 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.47
Parasail $0.50
SiliconFlow $0.55
AtlasCloud $0.60

Qwen3 Coder Flash Providers

Alibaba $0.30 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Kimi K2 Thinking Wins
0
Qwen3 Coder Flash Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingQwen3 Coder FlashWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
40.7--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
34.8--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
94.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
84.8--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
83.8--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
85.3--
Kimi K2 Thinking significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Kimi K2 Thinking
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Kimi K2 Thinking
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,535 tokens
Qwen3 Coder Flash
128,000
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
Kimi K2 Thinking has a 51% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricKimi K2 ThinkingQwen3 Coder FlashWinner
Tokens/second96.2 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.59sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureKimi K2 ThinkingQwen3 Coder Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyKimi K2 ThinkingQwen3 Coder Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMoonshotaiQwen
ReleasedNov 2025Sep 2025

Kimi K2 Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Kimi K2 Thinking with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder Flash has cheaper output pricing at $1.50/M tokens.
Kimi K2 Thinking scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 34.8, compared to Qwen3 Coder Flash's score of N/A.
Kimi K2 Thinking has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder Flash has a 128,000 token context window.
Kimi K2 Thinking does not support vision. Qwen3 Coder Flash does not support vision.