Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Moonshotai
Moonshotai
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.5-27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Kimi K2.5 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Benchmark Advantage
Kimi K2.5
Context Window
Qwen3.5-27B
Speed
Qwen3.5-27B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureKimi K2.5Qwen3.5-27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyKimi K2.5Qwen3.5-27B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMoonshotaiQwen
ReleasedJan 2026Feb 2026

Kimi K2.5 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5-27B has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Qwen3.5-27B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Qwen3.5-27B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 33.4, compared to Kimi K2.5's score of 25.8.
Kimi K2.5 has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window.
Kimi K2.5 supports vision. Qwen3.5-27B supports vision.