Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Moonshotai
Moonshotai
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Kimi K2.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Kimi K2.5
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureKimi K2.5Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyKimi K2.5Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMoonshotaiQwen
ReleasedJan 2026Feb 2026

Kimi K2.5 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Kimi K2.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.38/M tokens. Qwen3.5 397B A17B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Kimi K2.5's score of 25.8.
Kimi K2.5 has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
Kimi K2.5 supports vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.